Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) Practice Exam

Combining whole house surveillance and targeted surveillance is likely to provide the most useful information because it leverages the strengths of both methods. Whole house surveillance allows for comprehensive data collection across an entire facility or community, ensuring that no potential cases or outbreaks are overlooked. This method is particularly beneficial in identifying patterns or trends that may not be apparent through a single approach.

On the other hand, targeted surveillance focuses on specific populations or high-risk areas, which can yield more detailed insights into particular issues, such as outbreaks in vulnerable groups or localized infection patterns. By integrating both approaches, surveillance can capitalize on broad data coverage while also honing in on critical areas that require immediate attention or intervention.

This combined method not only enhances the quantity of data collected, but it also improves the quality of analysis by allowing for a more nuanced understanding of infection dynamics, ultimately leading to more effective public health responses and strategies. Other methods, while they may provide valuable information in certain contexts, do not achieve this level of comprehensiveness and focus simultaneously.